How does the palace of westminster fit into an overall argument of tradition and dissent.?

I need to construct a plausible argument with regards to the design of the new palace of westminster and Pugin's approach to the interior. I have covered the life of Pugin, his works, the difference within the gothic and classic architectural look, and the furnishings, but I cannot seem to cover an overall argument relating to the above and the tradition and dissent of Pugin. Please could someone help and advise as to where I could maybe get an argument from and how it would fit into the work I have already covered!!!